<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This thing called Grade R</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.saide.org.za/2012/01/18/this-thing-called-grade-r/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.saide.org.za/2012/01/18/this-thing-called-grade-r/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=this-thing-called-grade-r</link>
	<description>South African Institute for Distance Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:49:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosisi Feza</title>
		<link>http://blog.saide.org.za/2012/01/18/this-thing-called-grade-r/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosisi Feza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saide.org.za/?p=214#comment-186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Sheila

You are working on a very important issue in professionalising Early Chidhood Development inclusively. In my opinion we cannot seperate 0-4 qualification to grade R. I do not have insight on the level 3 and 4 curriculum, however I count on these teachers&#039; experience with children and training they have received. Early Childhood Development is the core of the Nation and foundation for future citizenry. Unless teachers of young children are exposed to developmental theories of young children we are not doing them justice. Our teacher can learn at different levels but with good course work we will all succeed. It is clear that the history of ECD being served by mothers who came to take care of children makes us wonder if they are ready for advance learning. I believe that they are ready at their level and we need to start somewhere where they are and push them to the required level as you say beef up the quality of level 3 and 4 which varies across the country. Therefore, I encourage you in this step and believe that we are ready because our children have ready long before now. It is a matter of urgency now to professionalize ECD as our children are growing in the most challanging times. Just to share yesterday I was sitting with my 7 year old on the balcony watching the Durban beautiful view. Opposite us was another block of flats that was lower than our level. I asked her &quot;Do you think I can jump to the other block and land on the roof?&quot; she responded &quot;No, no mom you cannot even the monkeys I was watching they will be pulled down to the floor before getting there the distance is too big&quot; I said &quot;But Jackie Chen does it on TV can&#039;t I learn.&quot; she laughed at me and said &quot;Mom at TV they use technology to do that he cannot do that in real life&quot; Don&#039;t you know that something pulls us down we cannot fly like birds, and when Jackie Chen falls on the ground it is not the real ground mom they make sure that they put things to protect him where he will fall&quot;. Then we went further talking about how robots work and the force of gravity grabbing the opportunity on my side. I was shocked to see her critical thinking she demonstrated because I thought I was chatting at her level which happened to be my level I guess. I think it is urgent that we professionalise ECD career period.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sheila</p>
<p>You are working on a very important issue in professionalising Early Chidhood Development inclusively. In my opinion we cannot seperate 0-4 qualification to grade R. I do not have insight on the level 3 and 4 curriculum, however I count on these teachers&#8217; experience with children and training they have received. Early Childhood Development is the core of the Nation and foundation for future citizenry. Unless teachers of young children are exposed to developmental theories of young children we are not doing them justice. Our teacher can learn at different levels but with good course work we will all succeed. It is clear that the history of ECD being served by mothers who came to take care of children makes us wonder if they are ready for advance learning. I believe that they are ready at their level and we need to start somewhere where they are and push them to the required level as you say beef up the quality of level 3 and 4 which varies across the country. Therefore, I encourage you in this step and believe that we are ready because our children have ready long before now. It is a matter of urgency now to professionalize ECD as our children are growing in the most challanging times. Just to share yesterday I was sitting with my 7 year old on the balcony watching the Durban beautiful view. Opposite us was another block of flats that was lower than our level. I asked her &#8220;Do you think I can jump to the other block and land on the roof?&#8221; she responded &#8220;No, no mom you cannot even the monkeys I was watching they will be pulled down to the floor before getting there the distance is too big&#8221; I said &#8220;But Jackie Chen does it on TV can&#8217;t I learn.&#8221; she laughed at me and said &#8220;Mom at TV they use technology to do that he cannot do that in real life&#8221; Don&#8217;t you know that something pulls us down we cannot fly like birds, and when Jackie Chen falls on the ground it is not the real ground mom they make sure that they put things to protect him where he will fall&#8221;. Then we went further talking about how robots work and the force of gravity grabbing the opportunity on my side. I was shocked to see her critical thinking she demonstrated because I thought I was chatting at her level which happened to be my level I guess. I think it is urgent that we professionalise ECD career period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mary Clasquin-Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.saide.org.za/2012/01/18/this-thing-called-grade-r/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mary Clasquin-Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saide.org.za/?p=214#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Sheila. Thank you for this initiative and for the role you and SAIDE are playing in Grade R debates. SANTS has received programme approval for its Diploma in Grade R Teaching from the DHET and we will shortly submit our CHE application. Here&#039;s my take on the Grade R Diploma: (1)  It has the potential to (and therefore must) improve the quality of not only teacher education programmes but the quality of teaching in all Grade R classrooms; (2) It will be a bridge between Levels 5 and 7 [SANTS&#039; Diploma in Grade R Teaching is designed to articulate with the BEd Foundation Phase Teaching]; (3) We are most excited that our students will have an accessible career path: (4) We will admit students who are often unable to access other Higher Education Institutions and for whom a straight BEd is not an option; (5) In conceptualising SANTS&#039; Grade R Diploma, we are strongly motivated by considerations of what would be best for our students who have completed Level 4 and 5 ECD training; and (6) In addition to formalising Grade R, we should also be focusing on professionalising Grade R. 
While SANTS is excited about our contribution to Grade R, we remain equally committed to supporting quality improvement in our ECD/pre-Grade R programmes. I am convinved that we can collectively do justice to both! Mary Clasquin-Johnson - ECD Academic Head, SANTS&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Sheila. Thank you for this initiative and for the role you and SAIDE are playing in Grade R debates. SANTS has received programme approval for its Diploma in Grade R Teaching from the DHET and we will shortly submit our CHE application. Here&#8217;s my take on the Grade R Diploma: (1)  It has the potential to (and therefore must) improve the quality of not only teacher education programmes but the quality of teaching in all Grade R classrooms; (2) It will be a bridge between Levels 5 and 7 [SANTS' Diploma in Grade R Teaching is designed to articulate with the BEd Foundation Phase Teaching]; (3) We are most excited that our students will have an accessible career path: (4) We will admit students who are often unable to access other Higher Education Institutions and for whom a straight BEd is not an option; (5) In conceptualising SANTS&#8217; Grade R Diploma, we are strongly motivated by considerations of what would be best for our students who have completed Level 4 and 5 ECD training; and (6) In addition to formalising Grade R, we should also be focusing on professionalising Grade R. <br />
While SANTS is excited about our contribution to Grade R, we remain equally committed to supporting quality improvement in our ECD/pre-Grade R programmes. I am convinved that we can collectively do justice to both! Mary Clasquin-Johnson &#8211; ECD Academic Head, SANTS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny L</title>
		<link>http://blog.saide.org.za/2012/01/18/this-thing-called-grade-r/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saide.org.za/?p=214#comment-173</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sheila&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People viewing this blog may also be interested in Eric Atmore&#039;s article on ECD &quot;Early Learning Opportunities Vital for National Senior Certificate Success&quot; published in NGO Pulse on 18th January 2012.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sheila</p>
<p>People viewing this blog may also be interested in Eric Atmore&#8217;s article on ECD &#8220;Early Learning Opportunities Vital for National Senior Certificate Success&#8221; published in NGO Pulse on 18th January 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

